That's the note "Received many dislikes due to fan backlash".
This note implies the main reason people disliked the video is because they are fans of the person being commentated on which is not true. Most of the times when people dislike commentaries (unless they're just doing it to be dicks) they do it because they have legitimate issues with the arguments someone makes.
I find that note pretty insulting to be honest.Read more >
There is this guy who constantly goes to the dirtbikeredden and skihound page to remove RedAppleGP from the list of people who commentated on them. Even after I linked the video. http://the-commentary-community.wikia.com/index.php?title=Dirtbikeredden&diff=4427&oldid=4426
Someone should do something about this. Thank you.Read more >
There is one thing I absoultely hated about the old commetnary community wiki. And that's these useless categories that can apply to anyone.
Mr. Enter haters? Most of the commentary community hate this guy. Animation community? That's also something that applies to most of the CC. Why not add the Pokémon Community, video gaming community or the film fan community while you're ahead? There were also subjective categories like trolls. With someone like Gligar13Vids it's obvious he's a troll, but whether or not someone is a troll isn't always obvious, and many disagree on who is and isn't a troll. And yeah I don't think it really matters if someone is an adult or a teenager. The teenager category only fits someone for a few years, and then the…
Read more >
There is one thing I'm wondering about. Should people who aren't part of the CC but still make commentaries have their own pages?
I mean people like The Amazing Atheist, Sargon of Akaad, Libertarian Socialist Rants and the Armoured Skeptic. These people I mentioned are political commentators. Should they have their own page, or should we only have pages on people who are officially members of the CC?Read more >
I recently cleaned up the trivia section on the article about me and put all the necessary information into the article itself and totally removed the rest.
This is supposed to be an encylopedia for information. I personally think there should be no trivia section in any article. If there is important information then it should be put somewhere in the article, but if it's just useful trivia that's not really that important it shouldn't be in the article at all.
We are trying to make this wiki better than the previous one. And I think removing trivia sections altogether is better than keeping it. If a user holds a record I think it's more important to mention that in the first paragraph of the article.Read more >